United States v. Guy J. Westmoreland
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Guy Westmoreland of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Westmoreland now appeals, arguing that (1) certain hearsay statements should not have been admitted into evidence; (2) certain factual determinations made by the trial judge should instead have gone to the jury; and (3) his motion for a new trial should have been granted. We affirm Westmoreland’s conviction, but vacate his sentence.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Westmoreland operated a gas station in downtown St. Louis, Missouri. This station supplied fuel to…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- United States v. Perez-RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Alex VazquezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Danny Smith and Harry D. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.