Legal Opinion
United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James Herriman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 19, 1999No. 98-1515, 98-1657, 98-2663PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
The appellants, Victor Eugene Robbins, Sr. (“Gene”), Roy Gordon Robbins (“Gordon”) and James Herriman, were charged in a three-count indictment with various offenses arising out of a large-scale marijuana operation. Count I charged the defendants with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Count II charged Mr. Herriman with possession with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Count III charged Gene Robbins and Gordon Robbins…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- United States v. Bahman Mansoori, Mark Cox, Mohammad Mansoori, Kenneth Choice, and Terry YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Wahid ShukriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. James E. FarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ernest D. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Keefer JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.