Legal Opinion
Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 30, 1996No. 2:95-cv-03777PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this antitrust action are eleven owners and operators of Domino’s Pizza franchises located in Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and South Carolina, as well as International Franchise Advisory Council, Inc. (“IFAC”), a Michigan corporation whose members include approximately 40% of the Domino’s Pizza franchisees located in the United States. IFAC brings this suit on its own behalf and on behalf of its member franchisees. On September 25,1995, Plaintiffs filed an amended…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Rohlfing v. Manor Care, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Exxon Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Chawla v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Bishop v. GNC FRANCHISING LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.