Van Landingham v. United Tuna Packers
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
This is an action to recover damages for the breach of a contract alleged to have been entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant on the seventh day of March, 1918, by the terms of which the defendant agreed to employ the plaintiff to act as its exclusive agent or broker in the sale of its entire pack of canned fish and fish products during the term of five years from April 1,1918, and up to and including March 31,1923, and for which the plaintiff was to receive certain stipulated commissions from the net price of the product thus sold. It was alleged that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Newhall v. Western Zinc Min. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gray v. Central Florida Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Buzard v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Sharp v. Eagle Lake Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Klorfine v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.