Legal Opinion

Doughty v. Hammond

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepstoh

This suit involves the question of the validity of subsection 3 of Sec. 1 of Ch. 118, Public Acts of 1957, amending T.C.A. sec. 30-610, said subsection appearing in the Code Supplement as subsection 4. This amendment was enacted to meet the decision in First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n of Memphis, Tennessee v. Dearth, 198 Tenn. 304, 279 S.W.2d 503.

Title 30 of the Code relates to and covers the broad subject of “Administration of Estates”. Sec. 610 thereof originally appeared as it now appears in subsection 1 of the amendment so that subsections 2, 3 and 4 are added by the amendment and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Irving Trust Co. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. House v. CrevelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. Bier v. BiggerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. Epperson v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nashville City Bank & Trust Co. v. Peery (In Re Peery)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984
  2. State, Department of Human Services v. NorthernCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  4. Crook v. CrookTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API