Howard v. State

OPINION

TATUM, Judge.

Woodrow Howard appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of fraudulent use of a credit card (T.C.A. § 39-1954), with a penitentiary sentence of three years. He makes no question concerning the sufficiency of the evidence or the conduct of trial. His assignments of error attack the constitutionality of T.C.A. § 39-1954 and the Trial Judge’s instructions to the jury. The assignments are without merit.

The appellant did not testify and introduced no evidence, leaving the State’s proof uncontradicted.. A purse of Mrs. Jerry W. Hitchcock, containing her BankAmericard, was…