Legal Opinion

Crichton v. Golden Rule Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 5, 2009No. 07-3333PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYKES, Circuit Judge.

John Crichton, Jr., sued Golden Rule Insurance Company asserting three fraud-based claims. The district court dismissed one claim with prejudice and gave Crichton an opportunity to replead the other two. That effort was unsuccessful; the district court held that the allegations in the remaining two claims failed to state a claim for relief and dismissed the case in its entirety. Crichton’s appeal requires us to consider three questions: (1) whether Crichton had standing to bring a claim under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (“ICFA”), 815…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Bryana Bible v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Sophie Toulon v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. United Food & Commercial Workers Unions & Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Margery Newman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API