Legal Opinion

Margery Newman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 6, 2018No. 17-1844PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wood, Chief Judge.

At age 56, Margery Newman purchased a long-term-care insurance plan from the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife"). She opted for one of MetLife's non-standard options for paying her insurance premiums; MetLife called the method she selected "Reduced-Pay at 65." When Newman was 67 years old, she was startled to discover that MetLife that year more than doubled her insurance premium. MetLife insists that the increase was consistent with Newman's insurance policy, including its Reduced-Pay-at-65 feature. Newman was unpersuaded and brought this action to vindicate her…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Yoram Kahn v. Walmart Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  2. Citizens Insurance Company of America v. Wynndalco Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  3. Valbruna Slater Steel Corporat v. Joslyn Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Courtney Webster v. CDI Indiana, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. Saika v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API