Legal Opinion
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 21, 2011No. 10-1686PublishedCited by 720 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in this case, Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust (“Pirelli”), initiated a putative class action under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. For tax law purposes, Pirelli is a voluntary employees’ beneficiary association, a tax exempt trust that exists to provide specified benefits to members of its related association. For our purposes, however, Pirelli is a third-party payor (typically one’s insurance company) that pays pharmacies for the portion of a drug price that exceeds its members’…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Bonte v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by720 opinions
- Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. AEI Life, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- ANCHORBANK, FSB v. HoferCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Cincinnati Life Insurance Comp v. Marjorie BeyrerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Holly Vanzant v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, IncorpoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
715 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.