Legal Opinion
Parcel 49c Limited Partnership v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 1, 1994No. 94-5085PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
After selecting Parcel 49C Limited Partnership, the General Services Administration (GSA) cancelled a solicitation for a new Federal Communications Commission (FCC) headquarters building. The United States Court of Federal Claims enjoined GSA’s cancellation. Parcel 49C Limited Partnership v. United States, No. 92-286C (Fed.Cl. Mar. 14, 1994). The trial court determined that GSA violated its duty to consider fairly all responsive bids. This court affirms that determination. Additionally, with modification of the relevant dates, this court upholds the trial court’s order…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Turner Const. Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Overstreet Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Seattle Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Hunt Building Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.