Legal Opinion
Warner v. Walsh
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 23, 1927No. 2849PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
The opinion of this court (10 F.[2d] 155) and the reversing opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals (15 F.[2d] 367) render unnecessary a restatement of the facts in this case. By a stipulation of facts filed June 14,1927, which was entered into for the purposes of this particular suit, many of the material allegations of the complaint are conceded, and it is agreed by counsel that this stipulation of the facts means that they are to be taken as the facts for this suit only.
The case now presented for adjudication is practically the same as that before the Circuit Court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Union & New Haven Trust Co. v. EatonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
- Fox v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Beatty v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. McCaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1931
- American Security & Trust Co. v. TaitDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1933
- Arizona Commercial Mining Co. v. CaseyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929
- George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Wunderle v. McCaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.