Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Heiner

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1925No. 3275PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

The defendant has filed an affidavit of defense under the Pennsylvania Practice Act (Pa. St. 1920, § 17200), raising questions of law. This affidavit is in lieu of demurrer under the old Practice Act, and admits all the facts well pleaded in the statement of claim.

The action is one of • assumpsit, wherein the plaintiff, Cora B. Beatty, as executrix of the last will and testament of John W. Beatty, deceased, seeks to recover from D. B. Heiner, collector of internal revenue of the Twenty-Third district of the United States, an alleged overpayment of income tax for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heiner v. BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  2. Warner v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
  3. Cloister Printing Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. Warner v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1928
  5. Leach v. NicholsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API