Legal Opinion

Arizona Commercial Mining Co. v. Casey

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 9, 1929No. 2239PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

This is an action brought to recover income and excess profits taxes assessed for the year 1917. The plaintiff duly returned and paid on its 1917 income an income tax of $20,- 575.24 and an excess profits tax of $1,880.90, or a total of $22,456.14. Early in 1920 tbe Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed an additional excess profits tax of $36,044.-30 which, on March 2, 1920, the plaintiff paid under protest to avoid penalties.

On October 19, 1920, the plaintiff filed with the collector of internal revenue for this district a claim for a refund of $27,325.-75, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. LaBelle Iron Works v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Red Wing Malting Co. v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Ritter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  5. Tucker v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Continental-Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  2. Henry Prentiss & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  3. Aladdin Co. v. WoodworthDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1930
  4. Leach v. NicholsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
  5. Mills v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API