Wunderle v. McCaughn
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The plaintiff has brought this suit to recover $3,-096.61, being a portion of an additional income tax assessed for the year 1918 and paid under protest. The additional assessment was based upon the rejection by the Commissioner of a deduction claimed, in the amount of $4,553.82 by the taxpayer. An affidavit of defense in the nature of a demurrer admits the facts' set forth in the statement which, summarized, are as follows:
The plaintiff was a candy manufacturer and for many years had in his employ one John F. Carson. Beginning January 1, 1892, the plaintiff agreed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Union & New Haven Trust Co. v. EatonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
- Union Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. McCaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
- Warner v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. McCaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1931
- American Security & Trust Co. v. TaitDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1933
- Art Metal Const. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Broderick v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Bernard Realty Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.