Legal Opinion

Miller v. Reiter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 1923No. 22,989PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action on a bond. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. • The defendants appeal from the order denying their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.

*111Tbe bond was executed upon tbe appeal of tbe defendant Reiter from a judgment directing tbe issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding bim to sign tbe license of tbe plaintiff to sell intoxicating liquors granted by tbe common council of Rochester. See State v. Reiter, 140 Minn. 491, 168 N. W. 714. Tbe defendant first executed a cost bond pursuant to G. S. 1913, § 8002, and later executed tbe bond in suit, with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Emerson v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Goebel v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  3. Roerig v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. v. PrinceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. State ex rel. Matthews v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Ellis v. LindmarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Mississippi Power Co. v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Hendrickson v. GrengsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API