Legal Opinion
Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 31, 1980No. 48033, 48116 and 48127PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, Justice.
These three appeals arise out of the same transactions and have been consolidated for consideration and decision. The plaintiff, Polaris Industries (Polaris), has recovered damages against Plastics, Inc. (Plastics) and seeks review of an order denying it compensation for prejudgment interest and for loss of profits.
Plastics has in turn joined Fusion Rubbermaid Corporation (Fusion) as a third-party defendant, seeking indemnity. Fusion appeals from a judgment granting Plastics indemnity, assigning as error an order denying Fusion’s motions to submit to the jury the question of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Leoni v. Bemis Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Ventura v. Titan Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Lesueur Creamery, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Haskon, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Hercules, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Glass v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Hinz v. Neuroscience, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.