Legal Opinion
Ellis v. Lindmark
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 10, 1929No. 26,873PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover damages for the negligence of the defendants. There was a verdict for the plaintiffs. The defendant Lindmark appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The defendant drug company appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The defendant Lindmark is a retail druggist in Moose Lake, Carlton county. The defendant Minneapolis Drug Company is a wholesale druggist in Minneapolis. On February 5, 1927, Lindmark ordered through the traveling salesman of the drug company a barrel of cod liver oil. He…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Davis v. Van Camp Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Dail v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Dail v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Emerson v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Morris v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Ford Motor Company, a Corporation v. Marvin D. ZahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Atkins v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Northern States Power Co. v. Lyon Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.