Legal Opinion

Yeargin Construction Co. v. Futren Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1976No. 7526SC798 and 7526SC953PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Plaintiff’s Appeal

The sole question presented by plaintiff’s appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees in amount of $31,900, representing ten percent of the principal amount of the verdict. We hold that the court did not err in denying the motion.

The contract between the parties contains the following provision :

“In the event any Progress Payment or any final payment, or any part of either of same, shall not be paid when and as the same shall become due and payable as provided herein, such Progress Payment or final payment, or part…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horner v. Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Tinsley v. . HoskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Hoskins v. HoskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Marine Ecology Systems, Inc. v. Spooners Creek Yacht Harbor, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. United States v. P. Browne & Associates, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
  4. Martin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Hicks v. Clegg's Termite & Pest Control, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API