EAC Credit Corporation v. Wilson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Where a promissory note contains a provision requiring the debtor to pay reasonable attorneys’ fees of the creditor in collection of the note, but a guaranty of payment of the note contains no such provision, are the guarantors liable under G.S. 6-21.2 for attorneys’ fees incurred by the creditor in an action on the guaranty contract ? This is the sole question presented on this, appeal.
Plaintiff contends that it is entitled to- recover attorneys’ fees in this action upon the guaranty contract by virtue of G.S. 6-21.2 which provides in pertinent part as follows:
“§ 6-21.2.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Evans v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Rouse v. Wooten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. CliftonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Cowan v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- ARCADY FARMS MILLING COMPANY v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Coastal Production Credit Ass'n v. Goodson Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- RC ASSOCIATES v. Regency Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. ElzeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.