Legal Opinion

EAC Credit Corporation v. Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 12, 1972No. 92PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Where a promissory note contains a provision requiring the debtor to pay reasonable attorneys’ fees of the creditor in collection of the note, but a guaranty of payment of the note contains no such provision, are the guarantors liable under G.S. 6-21.2 for attorneys’ fees incurred by the creditor in an action on the guaranty contract ? This is the sole question presented on this, appeal.

Plaintiff contends that it is entitled to- recover attorneys’ fees in this action upon the guaranty contract by virtue of G.S. 6-21.2 which provides in pertinent part as follows:

“§ 6-21.2.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Evans v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Rouse v. Wooten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. CliftonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Cowan v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. ARCADY FARMS MILLING COMPANY v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Coastal Production Credit Ass'n v. Goodson Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. RC ASSOCIATES v. Regency Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. ElzeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API