Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 8318SC849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

The general rule applicable to this case is that in the absence of any statutory liability therefor, attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation incurred by plaintiff against a defendant are not recoverable as an item of damage, either in a contract or a tort action. Construction Co. v. Development Corp., 29 N.C. App. 731, 225 S.E. 2d 623, review denied, 290 N.C. 660, 228 S.E. 2d 459 (1976). See generally Hightower’s N.C. Law of Damages, §§ 9-1 and 9-2. We here affirm the trial court’s order and hold that the general rule applies to this case and that attorney’s fees are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hiss v. FriedbergSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960
  2. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Owen v. SheltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  4. Cedarburg Light & Water Commission v. Glens Falls InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Federal Surety Co. v. Basin Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brooke Drywall of Columbia, Inc. v. Building Construction Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Gram v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. State Art Museum Building Commission v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Robinson v. HopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. State Ex Rel. State Art Museum Building Commission v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API