Legal Opinion

Northcutt v. Cleveland

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1985No. Civ. 4537PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action brought by the mother of two minor children residing in the state of Georgia, under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), against the father, a resident of Alabama.

The Family Court of Jefferson County entered a judgment against the father and ordered payment of support in the amount of $200 per month per child. The father, through able counsel, appeals and we affirm.

The father contends that an action brought pursuant to URESA was not appropriate, that the URESA petition should not have been entered into evidence, that venue is not proper in Jefferson…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wright v. MONTGOMERY CTY. DEPT. OF PENSIONS AND SEC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Ex Parte O'NeillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Willis v. LevesqueCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. O'HARA v. FloydCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  5. Armstrong v. SparksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte University of South AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte SnowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ex Parte TaborSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. SummerlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Ford v. LinesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API