Legal Opinion

Ford v. Lines

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 3, 1986No. Civ. 5451PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This proceeding was instituted under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Child Support Act (U.R.E.C.S.A.). The father appealed from an adverse judgment.

While several judgments were entered by the trial court, that court stated that the evidence in support thereof primarily flowed from an ore tenus trial that was held before the trial court on April 17, 1986. The record does not contain the court reporter's transcript, a statement of the evidence or an agreed statement of the case under Rules 10(d) and 10(e), A.R.A.P., as to that April 17, 1986 hearing. Consequently, we are required to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte O'NeillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Willis v. LevesqueCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. O'HARA v. FloydCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  5. Northcutt v. ClevelandCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. WallaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. McCarroll v. McCarrollCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Willcutt v. WillcuttCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. J.S.K. v. G.L.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API