Legal Opinion

Ex Parte O'Neill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 24, 1982No. 81-662PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

For a statement of the facts in this case see the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, O'Neill v. O'Neill, 420 So.2d 261 (1982).

This Court must determine whether the Court of Civil Appeals was correct under the terms of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act in upholding the order of the district court modifying the divorce decree of another jurisdiction and terminating periodic alimony payments. We affirm.

I

In 1951, the Alabama legislature adopted, with only minor changes, the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (hereinafter URESA). This act was designed to improve and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Huguley Water SystemSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Howard v. HowardMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Murphy v. MurphyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. O'HARA v. FloydCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  5. Ainbender v. AinbenderSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ellis v. EllisMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bushnell v. BushnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Ex Parte State of California and MillenderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Hammonds v. HammondsMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API