Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Summerlin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1993No. 1920628PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This child support case, arising under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), §§ 304-80 to -98, Ala. Code 1975, presents a novel legal question: Does a noncustodial parent have a duty to support his or her minor child even when the parents' divorce judgment specifically provides that "The parties agree that there will be no child support payments"?

We hold that all minor children have a fundamental right to parental support and that the divorce judgment in this case does not relieve either parent of the obligation to support a child, even though the child is not in his or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte University of South AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Willis v. LevesqueCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Northcutt v. ClevelandCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Cunningham v. CunninghamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TaborSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources ex rel. Roye v. HoggCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Floyd v. EdmondsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Wicker v. HallmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  5. Christopher v. ChristopherCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API