Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Barnhart
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 2, 2002No. CIV.A. H-01-2595PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOYT, District Judge.
Having conducted a review of the Memorandum and Recommendations [Doc. # 15], as well as all other materials on file in this proceeding, and noting that no objections have been filed to the Memorandum- and Recommendations, this Court finds that the Memorandum and Recommendations are well founded and are herein adopted in full. It is, therefore,
ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 11] is DENIED. Further, it is
ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 13] is GRANTED. Finally, it is
ORDERED that this matter…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lee v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Barella v. Village of FreeportDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Durden v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008