Legal Opinion
Durden v. Astrue
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 8, 2008No. Civil Action 4:07-cv-865PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from Judgment and Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees, For the following reasons, both Motions, Doc, No. 38 and Doc. No. 28, are GRANTED. The following clarification of the Court’s January 2008 Order shall be provided to the Administrative Law Judge on remand. Plaintiff will be awarded full attorneys’ fees.
I. BACKGROUND
This case has a long and somewhat unorthodox procedural history. Plaintiffs application for disability benefits was denied initially and on reconsideration. After a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Newton v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Travis RIPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Manuel M. Villa v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Carey v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shoulars v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- BLANCAS v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2010
- Cartlidge v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2021
- Grice v. SaulDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
- Lindsey v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.