State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Vaught
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
In this action for condemnation of land for highway purposes the jury rendered a verdict of “no damages.” The landowners’ motion for new trial was sustained and the Highway Commission has appealed. The difference between the award and that to which defendant-landowners claim they are entitled under their evidence exceeds $15,-000, and for that reason appellate jurisdiction is in this court.
The order of the trial court granting a new trial to landowners was as follows: “Now on this day it is ordered by the Court that the defendants’ motion for a new trial be and is…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Albert J. Hoppe, Inc. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Stith v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Walsh v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Dawson v. ScherffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Bierman v. LangstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Badahman v. Catering St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Davis v. PerkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of Joplin v. Joplin Union Depot Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Day Ex Rel. Day v. Mayberry Ex Rel. MayberryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Dick v. Children's Mercy HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.