Legal Opinion

Badahman v. Catering St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 9, 2013No. SC 92796PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZEL M. FISCHER, Judge.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of Sarah Badahman and against Catering St. Louis and its president, Mark Erker (collectively “CSL”), in the amount of $11,250 for compensatory damages and $2,000 for *33punitive damages. Badahman filed a motion for additur or, in the alternative, a new trial pursuant to § 537.068,1 Rule 78.01, and Rule 78.02. The circuit court sustained Badahman’s motion and gave the parties 30 days to accept a higher amount of compensatory damages or elect a new trial on these damages only. CSL would not agree to the enhanced compensatory damage award.…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Firestone v. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. Alcorn v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Central Trust and Investment Company v. SignalPoint Asset Management, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. Lillian M. Lewellen, Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Chad Franklin and Chad Franklin National Auto Sales North, LLC, Respondents/Cross-Appellants.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  4. Eckerberg v. Inter-State Studio & Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  5. Primitivo Soto v. Costco Wholesale CorpMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API