Bierman v. Langston
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
Plaintiff obtained a jury verdict against defendant in the amount of $12,500 for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The 17th ground in defendant’s motion for new trial was as follows: “Because the verdict and judgment entered in this case are excessive under the law and under the evidence and indicate that said verdict and judgment were the direct result of bias and prejudice of the jury in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.” The trial court sustained the motion by this order: “Defendant’s motion for new trial is sustained upon the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Stith v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Smith v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Ketcham v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Steuernagel v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bayne v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Moore v. GlasgowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Union Electric Company of Missouri v. McNultySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Coit v. BentzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Ray v. BartolottaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.