Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. King

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 28, 2007No. Civil Action 3:03cv2178 (SRU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.

This dispute arises out of a serious accident involving an all terrain vehicle (“ATV”) owned by Pendleton and Daphne King and operated by Pendleton King, Jr. The accident caused Conor McEntee to suffer a life-threatening head injury. McEntee has sued each of the Kings in state court for damages related to the accident. State Court Complaint, doc. # 146-14. 1 The Kings owned a homeowner’s insurance policy through Royal Indemnity Company (“RIC”), an umbrella policy through Royal Insurance Company of America (“RICA”), and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. KingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
  4. American National Property & Casualty Co. v. SorensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API