Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. King
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 8, 2008No. Civil Action 3:03cv2178 (SRU)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
At a recent conference with the parties, I held that, in light of the summary judgment ruling in this case, the claims remaining in the case were not viable and that judgment would enter on all claims. Defendants/third-party plaintiffs now move to reconsider that ruling. For reasons set forth below, their motion is denied.
1. Background
This dispute arose out of a serious accident involving an all-terrain vehicle (“ATV”) owned by Pendleton and Daphne King and operated by Pendleton King, Jr. The accident caused Conor McEntee to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Min Jin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Missouri Housing Development Commission v. Edward W. Brice, Jr., Paul Goodrich, Joseph TimiltyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Lee v. AIG Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Preferred Display, Inc. v. Great Am. Ins. Co. of N.Y.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.