Legal Opinion

Tingley v. Tingley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1936No. 25651PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

The defendant in error moves to dismiss this appeal for want of a positive averment by way of independent recital that the ease-made contains all of the evidence produced on the trial of the cause. It is also averred in connection with this motion that the evidence incorporated in the. cas'--made is actually incomplete; that certain documents offered and introduced in evidence are omitted.

We shall consider first the basis of the motion independent of the averment of incompleteness.

The independent recital which is absent from the case-made before us would, if incorporated, consist of an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Comrs. of Washita Co. v. HubbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Board of Commissioners v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. FurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  4. Wade v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Wagner v. Sattley Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitney v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. DuVall v. DuVallCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API