Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Lewis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2002No. WCB 97-04909; CA A103052; SC S47997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

In this workers’ compensation proceeding, the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) concluded that claimant’s occupational disease was compensable because medical evidence supported by objective findings established the existence of the disease, as ORS 656.802(2)(d) requires. The Court of Appeals reversed because, in its opinion, “objective findings,” as defined in ORS 656.005(19), did not support the medical evidence of claimant’s disease. SAIF v. Lewis, 170 Or App 201, 215, 12 P3d 498 (2000). Claimant seeks review of the Court of Appeals’ decision. We reverse.

The requirement of “objective…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. SAIF Corp. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. McLean v. Buck Medical Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CouchOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Pinney v. CarreraCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  3. SAIF Corp. v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. SAIF v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. CouchOregon Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API