Legal Opinion
Accent Designs, Inc. v. Jan Jewelry Designs, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 12, 1993No. 92 Civ. 0482 (RWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
The Defendants, Jan Jewelry Designs, Inc. (“Jan”) and Jan Brzozowski (“Brzozowski”) (collectively, the “Defendants”), have moved for an order for the following relief: partial summary judgment in their favor and against the plaintiffs, Accent Designs, Inc. (“Accent”) and Jesse Bands, Inc. (“Jesse”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P.; sanctions against the Plaintiffs and their counsel pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P.; the preclusion of certain evidence pursuant to Rule 1006, Fed.R.Evid.
The Plaintiffs have cross-moved for an order imposing…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Iowa Health System v. Trinity Health Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- Spotless Enterprises, Inc. v. Carlisle Plastics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Clontech Laboratories, Inc. v. Invitrogen Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Laser Diode Array, Inc. v. Paradigm Lasers, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Presidio Components Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.