Legal Opinion

Molzahn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 20, 1968No. W-3973PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THEIS, District Judge.

This action arises out of a claim under an insurance policy and is brought by plaintiff, Elaine J. Molzahn, spouse of the decedent, against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, defendant. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, with an amount in controversy of $10,000.00. The matter is now before this Court on cross motions for summary judgment. The Court finds as a preliminary matter that it has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of the action.

The pleadings reveal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. B. & H. Passmore Metal & Roofing Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  2. Miller v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. ZinnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ramsay v. Maryland American General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. City of Pittsburg, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  3. Elaine J. Molzahn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Bloomington, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. W. Virgil Wise and Anita Wise v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Maryland American General Insurance Co. v. RamsayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API