Legal Opinion

Maryland American General Insurance Co. v. Ramsay

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1975No. 962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

This is a summary judgment case. Rotha Ramsay, the widow of Scott Ramsay, brought suit against Maryland American General Insurance Company to recover death benefits under a policy of insurance which named her husband as the insured. Plaintiff and defendant each filed a motion for summary judgment. After a hearing *139on the motions, the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion. Defendant’s motion was denied. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Maryland American General Insurance Company, the insurer, has appealed. The parties will henceforth be referred to as “plaintiff”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hardee v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Combined American Insurance Company v. GanzerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Ferguson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Molzahn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramsay v. Maryland American General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API