Ramsay v. Maryland American General Insurance Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL, Justice.
The question on this appeal is whether the term “commercial automobile” as used in an exclusionary clause of an insurance policy applies to a Navy-owned pickup truck being operated by a Navy civilian employee in the course of his employment on Navy housing units.
In a suit by Rotha Ramsay, widow of Scott Ramsay, against Maryland American General Insurance Company to recover death benefits under a policy which named her Navy-employed husband as the insured, the trial court rendered a summary judgment for the plaintiff. A divided court of civil appeals reversed and rendered for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Western Reserve Life Insurance v. MeadowsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Providence Washington Insurance v. ProffittTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Lloyds Casualty Insurer v. McCraryTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- United Service Automobile Ass'n v. MilesTexas Supreme Court · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Norman v. Apache Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Hudson Energy Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- State Farm Life Insurance Co v. BeastonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.