Legal Opinion
"Automatic" Sprinkler Corp. of America v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1997No. Nos. 95-6599, 96-5159PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSiler, J., joined by Wellford, J.,
RYAN, J. (pp. 621-23), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Figgie International Inc. (“Figgie”) and “Automatic” Sprinkler Corporation of America (“Automatic”), a division of Figgie (collectively, “Petitioners”), petition this court to *615review the Decision and Order by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “the Board”) finding that Petitioners violated section 8(a)(1), (5), and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), (5), and (3), by subcontracting bargaining unit work and discriminatorily…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reno Hilton Resorts v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc., Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Automatic Sprinklerr Corporation Of America v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997