Legal Opinion

United Leasing Corp. v. Miller

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1982No. 8114SC1349PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Plaintiff presents four questions for review: (1) whether plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend its complaint should have been allowed, (2) whether the court erred in excluding certain testimony, (3) whether the court erred in entering an involuntary dismissal, and (4) whether the court erred in refusing to reopen the case to receive documentary evidence after plaintiff had rested.

In passing upon plaintiff’s arguments in this opinion, we take judicial notice of our own record in United Leasing I. 1 Brandis, N.C. Evidence § 13 (2d Rev. Ed. 1982).

I

Plaintiff contends that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Bryant v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Dealers Specialties, Inc. v. Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Bob Timberlake Collection, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Harrold v. DowdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Martin v. HareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Franko v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API