Legal Opinion
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Stupak
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1890No. 14,388PublishedCited by 37 opinions
From the Lake Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.
This was an action by the appellee against the appellant for personal injuries. The amended complaint was in a single paragraph, and, omitting the caption, is in the words and figures following:
“ The plaintiff, John Stupak, for amended complaint complains of the defendant, the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, and says that said defendant was, at the time of the commission of the grievances and happening of the injuries hereinafter mentioned, and still is, a railroad corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana, and owning and operating a line of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Chapman v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. MaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CorpsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.