Trieschock v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal is from summary judgment. In dispute here is the trial court’s decision that the statute of limitations had run in this “creeping disease” case. 1 The disposition of this issue entails consideration of two questions novel in this jurisdiction. First, with what degree of certainty must a plaintiff be aware of a medical condition in order to start the statute of limitations period running? Second, does a tentative, preliminary diagnosis — insufficient to start the statute running — activate a duty to make, with due diligence, further enquiries into the cause of his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Blue Diamond Coal Company v. PannellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Nelson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
3Cited by35 opinions
- Denise Bohus v. Stanley A. BeloffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Wyatt v. A-Best, CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Debiec v. Cabot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Mazur v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.