Legal Opinion
Watson v. D. A. Paddleford & Son
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 10, 1915No. 5439PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from Coleman County Court; F. M. Bowen, Judge. Action by D. A. Paddleford & Son against J. C. Watson and S. D. Beaver. Judgment against defendant Beaver by default, and judgment against defendant Watson, and defendant Watson appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
We adopt the statement of the nature and result of this case as set out in the brief of appellant, and admitted by ap-pellees to be correct:
“The appellees, D. A. Paddleford & Son, a partnership firm composed of D. A. Paddleford and Henry Paddleford, instituted this suit in the justice’s court of precinct No. 1, Coleman county, Tex., on October 23, 1913, against the defendant S. D. Beaver for the principal, interest, and attorney’s fees alleged to be due on a note, executed by said defendant. Beaver, to appellees, dated January 1, 1912, due on or before October 1, 1912, for the principal sum…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. PiersonTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
- McDavid v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Watts v. Corner, Walker & DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Red River Nat. Bank in Clarksville v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- McCaskill v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of Kaufman v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Hamilton Nat. Bank v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- South Texas Implement & MacHinery Co. v. Anahuac Canal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.