Legal Opinion

South Texas Implement & MacHinery Co. v. Anahuac Canal Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1925No. 8579. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This cause involves a controversy between a number of rival claimants to a fund of $4,174.19 in possession of the Standard Rice Company, and representing the proceeds of the sale to it by G. E. Barrow of his rice crop grown during the year 1921 on a farm he was cultivating in Chambers' county, Tex. After buying the rice but before paying for it," the rice company being besieged by different creditors of Barrow — one of them having run a garnishment on it out of the district court of Chambers county — went into the district court of Harris county, and, by bill of inter-pleader, sued Barrow and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Butt v. EllettSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. McDavid v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Barron v. San Angelo Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. McConnell v. LangdonIdaho Supreme Court · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. South Texas Implement & Machine Co. v. Anahuac Canal Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Hargrove v. A. B. Cornett EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API