Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1895No. 302PublishedCited by 83 opinions

Questions Certified from Court of Civil Appeals for Third District, in an appeal from Travis County.

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Associate Justice.

—The Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Supreme Judicial District has certified the following question, with accompanying explanatory statement, to wit:

“On the 23rd day of January, 1892, M. C. Alexander had rented and was occupying about 100 acres of land on R. F. Jones’ farm, part of the Antonio Ravarro grant, in Travis County, Texas, and on said day said Alexander executed the following instruments:
“ 'Garfield, Travis County, Texas, January 23, 1892.
“ 'September 1, after date, I, we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of Washington & Costley Bros., at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennock v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Low v. PewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Sillers v. LesterMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Comstock v. ScalesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hale v. HollonTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Vaughn v. DeitzTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Stone v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Bourn v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API