George v. Alabama Power Company
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
WOODALL, Justice.
Lee George appeals from summary judgments in favor of Alabama Power Company (“APCo”) in his action seeking compensation for injuries he sustained when he came in contact with a wire owned by APCo. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I. Procedural and Factual Background
Viewed in the light most favorable to George, the nonmovant, the evidence indicates the following. On May 12, 2003, George was electrically shocked and seriously injured while he was working as a traffic-signal technician for the City of Bir mingham (“the City”). The injury occurred as one of George’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Heastie v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. RoushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Kmart Corp. v. BassettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Thompson v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Alabama Power Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mazda Motor Corp. v. HurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
- Bryan v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Black Warrior Electric Membership Corp. v. McCarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Silbernagel Ex Rel. Silbernagel v. Maranatha Baptist Church, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Silbernagel Ex Rel. Silbernagel v. Maranatha Baptist Church, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.