Mazda Motor Corp. v. Hurst
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MURDOCK, Justice.
*171Mazda Motor Corporation ("Mazda") appeals from a judgment entered against it on two jury verdicts resulting from two complaints asserting product-liability claims filed in the Jefferson Circuit Court. The claims stem from a single-car accident that occurred on November 22, 2010, involving a 2008 Mazda3 automobile driven by Sydney McLemore ("Sydney") in which Natalie J. Hurst ("Natalie") was a passenger. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I. Facts
On the night of November 21, 2010, 15-year-old Natalie was spending the night with Sydney at the McLemore residence. At…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brewer v. AtkinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- Brewer v. AtkinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- Eady v. Fort Metal Plastic Co., Ltd.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
- Foy v. PettwayDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023
- Foy v. PettwayDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.