Silbernagel Ex Rel. Silbernagel v. Maranatha Baptist Church, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to affirm the trial court’s judgment in favor of Maranatha Baptist Church, Inc., with regard to the negligence claim.
The majority declines to consider the issue whether the doctrine of res ipsa lo-*606quitar applies to the facts of the present case because, it concludes, Sean Silberna-gel, as Caleb Silbernagel’s father and next friend, did not argue to the trial court that res ipsa loquitur applies. I disagree.
“Res ipsa loquitur means literally ‘the thing speaks for itself.’ It allows one, under certain circumstances to infer negligence from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kmart Corp. v. BassettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Khirieh v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Casey v. McConnellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Ex Parte AtchleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Ward v. Forrester Day Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.