Legal Opinion
Midfirst Bank v. C.W. Haynes & Co. a South Carolina Corp.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 3, 1994No. Civ. A. 3:93-1862-17PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.
This action involves a dispute regarding the ownership of, and right to proceeds payable under, seventeen mortgage notes originally executed in favor of defendant C.W. Haynes & Company, Inc. (“Haynes”) as mortgagee. The mortgage notes were secured by mortgages on the mortgagors’ residences, all of which are located in South Carolina. Haynes sold the mortgage notes to Inland Mortgage Company (“Inland”) who thereafter placed the mortgage notes in a “pool” of mortgage loans backing a security to be issued by Inland and guaranteed by the Government…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Randolph JakobetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Bank of New York v. RaftogianisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Georg v. Metro Fixtures Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- In re PhillipsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Phan v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.