State v. Sheltrey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Cant, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial .and conviction of grand larceny.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The assignments of error are based upon the alleged insufficiency of the evidence, the misconduct of the county attorney, and the refusal of the court to grant a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence.
The complaining witness, Stasni, testified that on February 21, 1906, he entered the appellant’s saloon in company with Cornelius Shea,. Cornelius Sullivan, and York Sullivan; that there were about fifteen persons then present in the saloon; that while he was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wellar v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Bunker v. United Order of ForestersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Espy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. DrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- George A. Hormel & Co. v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.