George A. Hormel & Co. v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $397 for injury to plaintiffs automobile truck caused by the careless operation of one of defendant’s street cars. The case was tried before Montgomery, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for the amount demanded. From the order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
Action for damages for injury to plaintiffs automobile truck, sustained in a collision with one of defendant’s street cars January 9, 1913. The complaint alleges negligence on the part of defendant in *470operating its car. The answer denies negligence and charges that the injuries were due to the negligence of plaintiff.
On January 9, 1913, plaintiff’s automobile delivery truck, in charge of its chauffeur, was proceeding along Second Avenue North, going in a southwesterly direction toward Fifth Street North in the city of Minneapolis. The auto truck collided with one of defendant’s cars coming…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sprague v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Bunker v. United Order of ForestersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Bartroot v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State v. SheltreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Ewing v. StickneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Syck v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Merek v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Unmacht v. WhitneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Miszewski v. BaxterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918